then really there is no Paragon in Mass Effect, There is only Renegade.

The game will take an exceptionally cheap turn because you can't actually reconcile paragon values at all as an Alliance Soldier with Sheps Paragon responses if Cerberus IS alliance. If Cerberus is ordained by the Alliance then Alliance values are misplaced from an avergae Paragon Shep. Paragons have consistently performed with a equal attitude to both aliens and humans, seeking to extend humanity but not at the cost of aliens. 'make sense' seems to mean here: 'it's ok if ME1 default rene choices are fail in ME2' and 'it's ok if ME2 default paragon choices are fail in ME3.' - that's fine because it pseudo rewards continuation players.īut per se that has nothing to do with how Paragon Sheps will respond once they realise that really the values they sort to extend and protect - the values of the Alliance - are in fact completely undermined. stonewalled? So you are saying that their questions were stonewalled? Is that your interpreation of the event or the undeniable meaning?ģ. Cerberus' methods cast a deep shadow over the Alliance if Cerberus is a black ops and supported extension of the Alliance.Ģ. It would make sense if all the Renegade choices from Mass Effect 1 that default ME2Shepard has were the worst choices, and if all the Paragon choices from Mass Effect 2 that default ME3Shepard will probably have were the worst ones.ġ. It's also why Admiral Kahoku and Ashley/Kaidan get stonewalled when they try to talk to the Alliance about Cerberus.Īlso, there's no need to talk about how it's unfair to Paragons, because you spent all of Mass Effect 2 working for Cerberus (and all of Mass Effect 1 working for the Alliance and Council). That's why they made Cerberus in the first place. We are talking about whether Cerberus is Alliance? Would you be happy as a Paragon if you found out that the Alliance had actually adopted Cerberus' methods?Ĭos that's whatsa goin on here.The Alliance didn't adopt Cerberus' methods.

Mass effect alliance soldier